Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 1 Variables and Relative Classes for 277 patients treated with linear sources

From: Brachytherapy of stage II mobile tongue carcinoma. Prediction of local control and QOL

Variables

Classes

No.

%

Sex

Male

169

61

 

Female

108

39

Age at diagnosis (yrs)

≤60

174

63

 

> 60

103

37

Growth pattern

Superficial

81

29

 

Exophytic

121

44

 

Invasive

75

27

Site

Side

254

92

 

Tip

1

0

 

Lower

20

7

 

Upper

2

1

Leukoplakia

Absent

67

24

 

Present

210

76

Tumor thickness (mm)

≤5

106

38

 

6–10

97

35

 

11–15

40

14

 

> 15

34

12

Maximum diameter (mm)

≤30

196

71

 

> 30

81

29

Brachytherapy source

192Ir hairpin

104

38

 

226Ra needle

162

58

 

137Cs needle

11

4

Brachytherapy dose (Gy)

≤70

216

78

 

> 70

61

22

Brachytherapy plane

Single

242

87

 

Double

32

12

 

Volume

3

1

External irradiation

+

45

16

 

-

232

84