Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.
Skip to main content

Table 2 Parameters of diagnostic performance on a per-patient basis

From: Retrospective analysis of the 18F-FDG PET/CT cutoff value for metabolic parameters was performed as a prediction model to evaluate risk factors for endometrial cancer

Surgico-pathological features

 

MTV vs. SUVmax

TLG vs. SUVmax

DMI

Pearson r

0.2896

0.4611

95% CI

0.02893 to 0.5134

0.2256 to 0.6457

P

0.0304

0.0003

ESI

Pearson r

0.4441

0.4793

95% CI

0.3435 to 0.8151

0.5626 to 0.8897

P

< 0.0001

< 0.0001

LNM

Pearson r

0.6352

0.7734

95% CI

0.2526 to 0.6021

0.2940 to 0.6299

P

< 0.0001

< 0.0001

  1. DMI: Deep Myometrial invasion, ESI: Endocervical stroma invasion, LNM: Lymph node metastases
Back to article page

Radiation Oncology

ISSN: 1748-717X

Contact us