Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison of radiotherapy complication rates between the IMRT combined with 3D postloading radiotherapy group and IMRT combined with freehand insertion postloading radiotherapy group

From: 3D-printed brachytherapy in patients with cervical cancer: improving efficacy and safety outcomes

Variables

3D radiotherapy

Freehand implant radiotherapy

 

χ2

P-value

(n = 24)

(n = 25)

 

Radiation enteritis [% (n)]

   

22.366

< 0.001***

 No

70.8% (17)

12.0% (3)

   

 Acute

4.2% (1)

24.0% (6)

   

 chronic

20.8% (5)

20.0% (5)

   

 Acute + chronic

4.2% (1)

44.0% (11)

   

Radiation cystitis [% (n)]

   

1.380

0.240

 Yes

20.8% (5)

36.0% (9)

   

 No

79.2% (19)

64.0% (16)

   

Rectovaginal fistula [% (n)]

    

0.235

 Yes

8.3% (2)

0.0% (0)

   

 No

91.7% (22)

100.0% (25)

   

Abdominal infection [% (n)]

    

0.490

 Yes

4.2% (1)

0.0% (0)

   

 No

95.8% (23)

100.0% (25)

   

Vesicovaginal fistula [% (n)]

   

2.319

0.128

 Yes

0.0% (0)

16.0% (4)

   

 No

100.0% (24)

84.0% (21)

   

Intestinal obstruction [% (n)]

    

0.490

 Yes

4.2% (1)

0.0% (0)

   

 No

95.8% (23)

100.0% (25)

   
  1. Note Data are presented as number (percentage). Abbreviations 3D radiotherapy, IMRT combined with 3D postloading radiotherapy group; Freehand implant radiotherapy, IMRT combined with freehand implantation of the posterior loading radiotherapy group