Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content
Fig. 4 | Radiation Oncology

Fig. 4

From: Stereotactic body radiotherapy as metastasis-directed therapy in oligometastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Fig. 4

Risk-of-bias assessment for collated outcomes and per reported outcome. According to the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool version 2, for A Collated outcomes, B Overall survival, C Toxicity, D PFS, E Local control, F HRQoL, G Systemic therapy-free survival, and H Distant PFS. High risk of bias was considered due to the following: bias due to deviations from intended intervention—In STOMP and STOP, a part of the CG received the intervention treatment. In CORE, completion of SOC differed between the IG and CG; bias due to missing outcome data—In ARTO and EXTEND, HRQoL assessments were only available for a part of the participants, at 3 months in ARTO and at baseline in EXTEND; and bias due to measurement of the outcome—In EXTEND, HRQoL assessments were optional for participants and willingness to respond may have differed between the arms. CG control group, D domain, HRQoL health-related quality of life, IG intervention group, PFS progression-free survival, SOC standard of care

Back to article page