Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.
Skip to main content

Table 6 Comparison of different channel and spatial attention pooling methods

From: Diffusion-CSPAM U-Net: A U-Net model integrated hybrid attention mechanism and diffusion model for segmentation of computed tomography images of brain metastases

Methods

DSC (%)

IoU (%)

Params (M)

GFLOPs (G)

CSPAM-U-Net (AvgPool)

72.8%

61.3%

32.30 M

52.39G

CSPAM-U-Net (MaxPool)

71.2%

60.4%

32.30 M

56.87G

CSPAM-U-Net (AvgPool & MaxPool)

75.6%

65.6%

32.30 M

58.05G

  1. DSC, Dice Coefficient; IoU, Intersection over Union; Params, Parameters; GFLOPs, Giga Floating-point Operations Per Second
Back to article page

Radiation Oncology

ISSN: 1748-717X

Contact us