- Study Protocol
- Open access
- Published:
Efficacy and safety of concurrent programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor and definitive radiotherapy with immunonutrition support in esophageal squamous cell cancer: a phase II multicenter clinical trial
Radiation Oncology volume 20, Article number: 58 (2025)
Abstract
Background
Esophageal cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors, with China accounting for 50% of the world’s total incidence. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) with platin-based dual-drug regimen is the standard treatment for inoperable, locally advanced esophageal cancer in patients with a good performance status. However, certain patients possess risk factors that heighten toxicity and reduce their tolerance to cCRT, thereby challenging the feasibility of standard treatment. This study evaluates an alternative therapeutic approach combining programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor (PD-1 inhibitor), definitive radiotherapy, and immunonutrition support for patients with unresectable non-metastatic esophageal cancer expressing PD-L1 who are intolerant to cCRT.
Methods
This is a phase II, single-arm, multicenter clinical trial involving patients with histologically confirmed unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), who exhibit positive PD-L1 and are unsuitable for cCRT. Participants will receive a total radiotherapy dose of 50–60 Gy in 25–30 fractions, sintilimab (200 mg every three weeks), alongside, supplemented by enteral nutritional emulsion (600–1600 ml/day). The primary endpoint is the 1-year progression-free survival rate, with secondary endpoints including objective response rate, overall survival and incidence of adverse events.
Conclusion
This research has the potential to redefine treatment for inoperable ESCC patients who cannot tolerate conventional therapies. By evaluating a less toxic regimen that combines immunotherapy, radiotherapy, and nutritional support, we aim to determine if this approach can improve both survival rates and quality of life. The synergistic effects of immunonutrition support and PD-1 inhibitor will also be explored.
Trial registration
NCT06342167.
Background
Esophageal cancer, a devastating malignancy with a disproportionately high incidence in China, presents a significant global health challenge [1]. The squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) subtype, prevalent in China, often diagnosed at the middle or locally advanced (LA) stage, resulting in a poor prognosis with only a 20% 5-year overall survival rate [1, 2]. More than half of these patients are not suitable for surgery, making definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) the standard curative treatment. However, some patients, particularly those who are malnourished, elderly, or have pre-existing conditions, are unable to tolerate cCRT due to its associated toxicity [3]. This unmet need underscores the urgency of developing alternative therapeutic strategies that are both potent and well-tolerated.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), particularly programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor, have significantly advanced the treatment of metastatic esophageal cancer, improving both overall survival and progression-free survival in patients [4,5,6,7,8]. Recent preclinical studies have highlighted the potential synergistic effects of combining immunotherapy with radiotherapy, showing enhanced tumor regression compared to radiotherapy alone [9, 10]. This combination therapy is particularly effective in patients with positive PD-L1 expression and has shown promising results in clinical trials for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), achieving longer progression-free survival compared to cCRT [11, 12]. However, clinical evidence on the use of single-agent immunotherapy in conjunction with radiotherapy for ESCC remains scarce, especially in the context of PD-L1 positive tumors.
To address this issue, we started a single-arm trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of concurrent immunotherapy (sintilimab) plus definitive radiotherapy with immunonutrition support (enteral nutritional emulsion (TPF-T) followed by consolidation immunotherapy in patients with inoperable ESCC, who are PD-L1 positive expressed and intolerant to cCRT. The aim of current trial is to determine whether the current treatment regimen could offer comparable outcomes as cCRT.
Methods and study design
Study design and participants
This is a prospective, single-arm, phase II clinical trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sintilimab plus definitive radiation therapy for PD-L1-positive unresectable ESCC (Fig. 1). Patients eligible for enrollment were adults (≥ 18 years) with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of locally advanced or early stage ESCC deemed unresectable and unsuitable for cCRT by a multidisciplinary team, with no history of prior systemic therapy. Additionally, inclusion criteria mandated a PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) or combined positive score (CPS) of at least 1%, as assessed by the 22C3 pharmDx assay, and the presence of at least one measurable lesion according to RECIST v1.1. Participants were also required to have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0–2 and an estimated life expectancy of more than 3 months. To ensure safety, adequate organ function was also a prerequisite. Conversely, patients were excluded if they presented a high risk of bleeding or perforation due to tumor invasion of adjacent organs or fistula formation. A history of prior malignancy (excluding certain non-melanoma skin cancers) within 3 years, previous systemic immunological therapy (except for localized pleural effusion management), or previous chest radiotherapy were additional exclusion criteria.
Treatments
Interventions consist of 50–60 Gy in 25–30 fractions of radiotherapy and 200 mg of sintilimab (PD-1 inhibitor) administered three times weekly, along with enteral nutritional emulsion (TPF-T) support (600–1600 ml per day according to the nutrition status evaluation). The administration of sintilimab will continue until disease progression, death, intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of informed consent, initiation of new anti-tumor treatment, or termination of treatment for other reasons as stipulated by the protocol.
Endpoints and assessments
The primary objective of this clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacy of combination of PD-1 inhibitor and definitive radiotherapy with immunonutrition support. The primary endpoint is the one-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate, as determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Secondary endpoints include objective response rate (ORR) and the duration of PFS until disease progression or death. Objective tumour assessments are performed by independent central review and investigators in accordance with RECIST v1.1. The staging assessments include neck/chest/abdominal/pelvic CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of brain, gastroscope, and radionuclide bone. Positron emission tomography (PET)-CT was recommended but not mandatory. Follow-up is conducted at baseline and every 8 weeks in the first year,12 weeks in the second year and every 24 weeks from the third to fifth year, until progression or for five years post-treatment initiation.
The safety and tolerability will be rigorously monitored throughout the trial, with adverse events (AEs). Safety variables include symptoms, vital signs, physical examinations, evaluation of changes to concomitant medications, clinical laboratory parameters (hematology, serum chemistry), and the incidence, timing and severity of AE. AEs will be graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.
Expression of PD-L1 in fresh or archival tumor sample was assessed during screening period with the PD-L1 immunohistochemistry 22C3 pharmDx assay (Agilent Technologies, Carpinteria, CA, USA). The tumour proportion score was defined as the percentage of the number of viable tumor cells showing partial or complete membrane staining. The combined positive score was defined as the percentage of the number of all PD-L1–expressing cells (tumor cells, lymphocytes, macrophages) to the number of all tumor cells. Tumor microenvironment and peripheral blood were monitored at baseline and after 40 Gy radiation for association with efficacy. Tumor biopsies and peripheral blood mononuclear cells will be collected at two key time points to facilitate transcriptomic profiling. Baseline samples will be obtained prior to the initiation of treatment to establish a reference for molecular analysis. Post-treatment samples will be collected after the completion of radiotherapy at a dose of 40 Gy or at the time of disease progression, whichever occurs first.
Sample size
We hypothesize that the addition of a PD-L1 inhibitor to radiotherapy will increase the 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate from 40% [13,14,15] to 60% [13, 15,16,17]. A total of 58 patients are necessary to detect a 20% improvement of 1-year PFS rate with 80% power at a one-sided type error of 0.025.
Trial status
This study protocol was finalized on August 18, 2023, as Version 2023 v1.0, and subsequently amended on February 1, 2024, as Version 2024 v1.0. Recruitment for the trial began on December 1, 2023, at multiple participating centers across China. The planned sample size for the study is 58 patients, and we anticipate completing patient enrollment by December 2026.
Ethical considerations
This study adheres to the ethical principles set forth in the Declaration of Helsinki and the International Ethical Guidelines of the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. All participants will provide written informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Ethical approval has been granted by the Independent Ethics Committee of the National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, affiliated with the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College (Study ID: NCC4409). The study’s protocol is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT06342167.
Discussion
Esophageal cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors, with China accounting for 50% of the world’s total incidence, of which squamous cell carcinoma accounts for over 90%. Recent study has reinforced the standard management of LA-ESCC. However, it still resulted in high local recurrence rates of approximately 50% and 3-year PFS < 50% [16,17,18,19]. For patients who decline or are ineligible for cCRT, radiotherapy (RT) alone is the preferred alternative, but 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was only about 40% [13,14,15]. Therefore, new treatment options are required for this population of patients. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an alternative by combining immunotherapy (sintilimab) and definitive radiotherapy with immunonutrition support (enteral nutritional emulsion (TPF-T)) for inoperable ESCC patients with PD-L1 positive expression and intolerant to cCRT.
The synergistic effects of combining immunotherapy with radiotherapy have been proved in both basic and clinical studies. In mechanism research, radiotherapy induces immunogenic cell death in cancer cells, leading to the release of tumor-associated antigens. These antigens are captured by antigen-presenting cells and then presented to T cells, effectively creating an “in situ vaccine” that activates a systemic adaptive immune response to eradicate tumors [20, 21]. Additionally, radiotherapy modifies the tumor microenvironment by increasing the expression of PD-L1 and altering the levels of various cytokines and chemokines. This transformation changes immunologically “cold” tumors into “hot” tumors, making them more receptive to immunotherapy [22, 23]. ICIs complement this by activating cytotoxic T cells to target tumor cells and normalizing tumor vasculature, which enhances tissue perfusion, reduces tumor hypoxia, and increases the tumor’s sensitivity to radiotherapy [24, 25]. In clinical treatment, integration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with RT has shown promise, particularly in phase I/II trials in LA-ESCC [18, 26]. ICIs alone was reported with clinical response rates of 22–33% and a median PFS of 1.8–3.6 months in advanced esophageal cancer patients [5, 27,28,29,30]. However, when combined with radiotherapy, the median PFS was increased to 12.2 months and the one-year OS rate stood at 78.4% (95% CI, 66.9 to 92.0), with the median OS not yet reached [18]. In another trial, radiotherapy plus camrelizumab resulted in an ORR of 74%. At a median follow-up of 31.0 months (95% CI, 27.0–35.1), the median OS was 16.7 months (95% CI, 5.9–27.9), and the median PFS was 11.7 months (95% CI, 0–30.3) [26]. In addition, the safety profile of combined RT and ICIs (camrelizumab/toripalimab) aligns with those of the individual treatments [18, 26]. All patients encountered treatment-related adverse events (AEs), though the majority were mild to moderate (grade 1–2), with no grade 5 events observed. All the Grade 3 and 4 radiotherapy-related AEs, such as lymphopenia, esophagitis, laryngitis, and leukopenia could be managed without discontinuation of radiotherapy, which suggested that the combined therapy does not exacerbate radiotherapy-related toxicities and may even be less severe than those noted with cCRT [16, 17, 19]. The incidence of grade 3 pneumonitis was 5%, comparable to the 6.7% rate observed with camrelizumab alone [28].
Another novel aspect of this study is the integration of immunonutrition support to the immunoradiotherapy which may improve the efficacy. One of the major reasons for poor outcomes in ESCC patients is a profound malnutrition. Epidemiological surveys indicated around 57 − 69% of patients experience marked body weight reductions (about 13–16% loss) [31, 32], across inpatient and outpatient cohorts [33]. The malnutrition is exacerbated by a cytokine-mediated inflammatory state, which impairs the host’s immune response and tissue regeneration and emerges as an autonomous risk determinant for complications associated with treatment [31, 34]. Pharmaconutrition, also referred to as immune-modulating nutrition (IMN) containing specific nutrients to improve nutritional condition while concurrently modulating the host’s immunological response and its inflammatory reaction to stress, presenting a potential therapeutic avenue [35, 36]. For instance, studies by Kemen et al. and Sorensen et al. demonstrated that nutritional support enriched with omega-3 fatty acids, ribonucleic acids, and arginine increased T lymphocytes in gastrointestinal and head and neck cancer patients within 10 days [37, 38]. A randomized controlled trial with 71 esophageal cancer patients showed that IN, containing arginine, glutamine, and omega-3 fatty acids, maintained a lower CD4/CD8 ratio compared to a standard formula, suggesting better immune modulation [39]. Further findings involving 28 patients undergoing RT for esophageal and head and neck cancers, who received an IMN formula enriched with eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids, arginine, and nucleotides, reported no decline in the CD4/CD8 ratio and reduced IFN-g production, indicating sustained immune function [40]. Our previous study systematically evaluated the combined effects of anti-PD-1 treatment and IMN on tumor growth and immune modulation in a xenograft tumor model in mice [41]. Our findings revealed that anti-PD-1 combined with IMN supplementation, significantly inhibited tumor growth more effectively than anti-PD-1 treatment alone. These results collectively suggest that IMN may help modulate immune responses and reduce inflammation during radiotherapy, potentially enhancing the host’s capacity to manage oxidative stress and systemic inflammation.
In conclusion, the study protocol reflects a rigorous design that prioritizes safety and potential clinical benefit. The addition of immunonutrition is intended to support overall patient tolerance and potentially increase ICIs efficacy by modulating host-tumor immune reaction. Should the results confirm the hypothesis that the current combination therapy is both safer and effective, it could improve the current treatment paradigm for non-metastatic inoperable ESCC patients, offering a viable, less toxic treatment option without comprising efficacy.
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Abbreviations
- cCRT:
-
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy
- PD-1:
-
Programmed cell death protein 1
- ESCC:
-
Esophageal squamous cell cancer
- LA:
-
locally advanced
- ICIs:
-
Immune checkpoint inhibitors
- TPF-T:
-
Enteral nutritional emulsion
- TPS:
-
Tumor proportion score
- CPS:
-
Combined positive score
- ECOG:
-
Eastern cooperative oncology group
- NSCLC:
-
Non-small cell lung cancer
- CTCAE:
-
Common terminology criteria for adverse events
- RECIST:
-
Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors
- PFS:
-
Progression-free survival
- ORR:
-
Objective response rate
- AE:
-
Adverse event
- RT:
-
Radiotherapy
- IMN:
-
Immune-modulating nutrition
References
Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(3):229–63.
He Y, Li D, Shan B, Liang D, Shi J, Chen W, et al. Incidence and mortality of esophagus cancer in China, 2008–2012. Chin J Cancer Res. 2019;31(3):426–34.
Herskovic A, Martz K, al-Sarraf M, Leichman L, Brindle J, Vaitkevicius V, et al. Combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in patients with cancer of the esophagus. N Engl J Med. 1992;326(24):1593–8.
Kojima T, Shah MA, Muro K, Francois E, Adenis A, Hsu CH, et al. Randomized Phase III KEYNOTE-181 study of Pembrolizumab Versus Chemotherapy in Advanced Esophageal Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(35):4138–48.
Huang J, Xu J, Chen Y, Zhuang W, Zhang Y, Chen Z, et al. Camrelizumab versus investigator’s choice of chemotherapy as second-line therapy for advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCORT): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(6):832–42.
Sun JM, Shen L, Shah MA, Enzinger P, Adenis A, Doi T, et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of advanced oesophageal cancer (KEYNOTE-590): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2021;398(10302):759–71.
Luo H, Lu J, Bai Y, Mao T, Wang J, Fan Q, et al. Effect of Camrelizumab vs Placebo added to Chemotherapy on Survival and Progression-Free Survival in patients with Advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: the ESCORT-1st Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2021;326(10):916–25.
Kato K, Cho BC, Takahashi M, Okada M, Lin CY, Chin K, et al. Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma refractory or intolerant to previous chemotherapy (ATTRACTION-3): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(11):1506–17.
Park SS, Dong H, Liu X, Harrington SM, Krco CJ, Grams MP, et al. PD-1 restrains Radiotherapy-Induced Abscopal Effect. Cancer Immunol Res. 2015;3(6):610–9.
Deng L, Liang H, Burnette B, Beckett M, Darga T, Weichselbaum RR, et al. Irradiation and anti-PD-L1 treatment synergistically promote antitumor immunity in mice. J Clin Invest. 2014;124(2):687–95.
Tachihara M, Tsujino K, Ishihara T, Hayashi H, Sato Y, Kurata T, et al. Durvalumab Plus Concurrent Radiotherapy for treatment of locally Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: the DOLPHIN phase 2 Nonrandomized Controlled Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2023;9(11):1505–13.
Ohri N, Jolly S, Cooper BT, Kabarriti R, Bodner WR, Klein J, et al. Selective personalized RadioImmunotherapy for locally Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Trial (SPRINT). J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(5):562–70.
Li C, Tan L, Liu X, Wang X, Zhou Z, Chen D, et al. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the era of intensity modulated radiotherapy: a propensity score-matched analysis. Thorac Cancer. 2021;12(12):1831–40.
Liu Y, Zheng Z, Li M, Zhang Y, Zhao F, Gong H, et al. Comparison of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with radiotherapy alone for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer in elderly patients: a randomized, multicenter, phase II clinical trial. Int J Cancer. 2022;151(4):607–15.
Ji Y, Du X, Zhu W, Yang Y, Ma J, Zhang L, et al. Efficacy of concurrent Chemoradiotherapy with S-1 vs Radiotherapy alone for older patients with esophageal Cancer: a Multicenter Randomized Phase 3 clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2021;7(10):1459–66.
Chen Y, Ye J, Zhu Z, Zhao W, Zhou J, Wu C, et al. Comparing Paclitaxel Plus Fluorouracil Versus Cisplatin Plus Fluorouracil in Chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell Cancer: a Randomized, Multicenter, Phase III Clinical Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(20):1695–703.
You J, Zhu S, Li J, Li J, Shen J, Zhao Y, et al. High-dose Versus Standard-Dose intensity-modulated Radiotherapy with Concurrent Paclitaxel Plus Carboplatin for patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label, phase 3 superiority trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2023;115(5):1129–37.
Zhu Y, Wen J, Li Q, Chen B, Zhao L, Liu S, et al. Toripalimab combined with definitive chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (EC-CRT-001): a single-arm, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2023;24(4):371–82.
Suntharalingam M, Winter K, Ilson D, Dicker AP, Kachnic L, Konski A, et al. Effect of the addition of Cetuximab to Paclitaxel, Cisplatin, and Radiation Therapy for patients with esophageal Cancer: the NRG Oncology RTOG 0436 phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3(11):1520–8.
Zhang Z, Liu X, Chen D, Yu J. Radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy: the dawn of cancer treatment. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2022;7(1):258.
Wang Y, Liu ZG, Yuan H, Deng W, Li J, Huang Y, et al. The reciprocity between Radiotherapy and Cancer Immunotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25(6):1709–17.
Lim SH, Hong M, Ahn S, Choi YL, Kim KM, Oh D, et al. Changes in tumour expression of programmed death-ligand 1 after neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with squamous oesophageal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2016;52:1–9.
Sato H, Niimi A, Yasuhara T, Permata TBM, Hagiwara Y, Isono M, et al. DNA double-strand break repair pathway regulates PD-L1 expression in cancer cells. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):1751.
Tian L, Goldstein A, Wang H, Ching Lo H, Sun Kim I, Welte T, et al. Mutual regulation of tumour vessel normalization and immunostimulatory reprogramming. Nature. 2017;544(7649):250–4.
Zheng X, Fang Z, Liu X, Deng S, Zhou P, Wang X, et al. Increased vessel perfusion predicts the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade. J Clin Invest. 2018;128(5):2104–15.
Zhang W, Yan C, Gao X, Li X, Cao F, Zhao G, et al. Safety and feasibility of Radiotherapy Plus Camrelizumab for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Oncologist. 2021;26(7):e1110–24.
Doi T, Piha-Paul SA, Jalal SI, Saraf S, Lunceford J, Koshiji M, et al. Safety and Antitumor Activity of the Anti-programmed Death-1 antibody pembrolizumab in patients with Advanced Esophageal Carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(1):61–7.
Huang J, Xu B, Mo H, Zhang W, Chen X, Wu D, et al. Safety, Activity, and biomarkers of SHR-1210, an Anti-PD-1 antibody, for patients with Advanced Esophageal Carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24(6):1296–304.
Kudo T, Hamamoto Y, Kato K, Ura T, Kojima T, Tsushima T, et al. Nivolumab treatment for oesophageal squamous-cell carcinoma: an open-label, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(5):631–9.
Shah MA, Kojima T, Hochhauser D, Enzinger P, Raimbourg J, Hollebecque A, et al. Efficacy and safety of Pembrolizumab for heavily pretreated patients with Advanced, metastatic adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the Esophagus: the phase 2 KEYNOTE-180 study. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5(4):546–50.
Bozzetti F. Nutritional support in patients with oesophageal cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2010;18(Suppl 2):S41–50.
Garth AK, Newsome CM, Simmance N, Crowe TC. Nutritional status, nutrition practices and post-operative complications in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2010;23(4):393–401.
Bozzetti F, Group SW. Screening the nutritional status in oncology: a preliminary report on 1,000 outpatients. Support Care Cancer. 2009;17(3):279–84.
Davies SJ, West MA, Rahman SA, Underwood TJ, Marino LV. Oesophageal cancer: the effect of early nutrition support on clinical outcomes. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2021;42:117–23.
Cerantola Y, Hubner M, Grass F, Demartines N, Schafer M. Immunonutrition in gastrointestinal surgery. Br J Surg. 2011;98(1):37–48.
Wong CS, Aly EH. The effects of enteral immunonutrition in upper gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2016;29:137–50.
Kemen M, Senkal M, Homann HH, Mumme A, Dauphin AK, Baier J, et al. Early postoperative enteral nutrition with arginine-omega-3 fatty acids and ribonucleic acid-supplemented diet versus placebo in cancer patients: an immunologic evaluation of impact. Crit Care Med. 1995;23(4):652–9.
Sorensen D, McCarthy M, Baumgartner B, Demars S. Perioperative immunonutrition in head and neck cancer. Laryngoscope. 2009;119(7):1358–64.
Sunpaweravong S, Puttawibul P, Ruangsin S, Laohawiriyakamol S, Sunpaweravong P, Sangthawan D, et al. Randomized study of antiinflammatory and immune-modulatory effects of enteral immunonutrition during concurrent chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer. Nutr Cancer. 2014;66(1):1–5.
Talvas J, Garrait G, Goncalves-Mendes N, Rouanet J, Vergnaud-Gauduchon J, Kwiatkowski F, et al. Immunonutrition stimulates immune functions and antioxidant defense capacities of leukocytes in radiochemotherapy-treated head & neck and esophageal cancer patients: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. Clin Nutr. 2015;34(5):810–7.
Xiao X, Luo S, Huang J, Wan B, Bi N, Wang J. Synergistic effects of Ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation and programmed cell death protein 1 blockade on tumor growth and immune modulation in a xenograft model of esophageal cancer. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2024;61:308–15.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge Beijing Sinuo Service Co., Ltd. for their support for this manuscript.
Funding
This study is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (82071759).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
N.B. and J.D.; methodology, J.W. and F.H.; formal analysis, J.W., F.H. and L.W.; data curation, Y.M., Y.Y, Y.W and X.X; writing—original draft preparation, J.W. and F.H.; writing—review and editing, N.B., J.D. and L.W.; supervision and project administration, N.B. and J.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study adheres to the ethical principles set forth in the Declaration of Helsinki and the International Ethical Guidelines of the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. All participants will provide written informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Ethical approval has been granted by the Independent Ethics Committee of the National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, affiliated with the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College (Study ID: NCC4409). The study’s protocol is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT06342167.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Yuan, Y., Luo, S., Wang, X. et al. Efficacy and safety of concurrent programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor and definitive radiotherapy with immunonutrition support in esophageal squamous cell cancer: a phase II multicenter clinical trial. Radiat Oncol 20, 58 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13014-025-02604-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13014-025-02604-z